the graph below shows about car ownership between 1975 and 2015
The line graph illustrates the proportion of cars owned by people living in Britain over a period of 30 years, commencing in 1975.
As can be inferred from the graph, while there were gradual increases in the percentage of owning 2 cars and 3 cars, the downward trend was seen in that of having no car. Another key feature is that possessing 1 car accounted for the highest rate during the period shown.
In 1975, the ratio of having 3 cars in the UK was lowest, with approximately 4%. This figure rose gradually to in the vicinity of 10% by 2005. A similar upward trend was witnessed in the figure for 2 cars, with which climbing from about 6% in 1975 to nearly 19% by the end of the period studied.
A downward pattern was registered in the proportion of having no car. To be specific, the rate of no car was about 44%. This figure decreased significantly to approximately 22% by the last year. Finally, there was a gradual fall in the ratio of possessing 1 car, from 45% in the year 1975 to about 39% in 1985, before climbing considerably to 45% by the end of the period survey.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-11 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-11 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-11 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-11 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-09 | Estriper | view |
- The government should invest more money in teaching science than in other subjects for a country s development and progress To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- In the present era children are found to have fewer responsibilities than it used to be in the past time Some people consider it as positive development however some other people believe it to be a negative trend 73
- Advertisements are becoming more and more common in everyday life Is it positive or negative development 61
- Nowadays it is not only large companies that can make films Digital technology enables anyone to produce films Do you think it is a positive or negative development 73
- The maps show an art gallery in Australia in 1950 and now Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 310, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...% in the year 1975 to about 39% in 1985, before climbing considerably to 45% by t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 886.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.407960199 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60190919083 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517412935323 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2579722859 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.6 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.8 5.23603664747 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200189769948 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0851685109327 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.052056343641 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13427748117 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0141072681766 0.0819641961636 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.2329268293 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.3 11.4140731707 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.