The chart below gives information about different types of in one country in 1960 and 2011.
The pie chart compares about other types of obsolete disposed.
It is clear that rated the waste disposed for paper sectors had decreased significantly from 1960 to 2011. While in 1960 other and paper is highest but in 2011 is decline.
Look at the first pie chart in 1960. It can be seen that rated of wood for waste disposed is lowest among 9 segments with has figure of 4% but this figure to 8% in 2011. Meanwhile, has 25% of waste disposed in the paper but in 2011 lowest ten percents have number 15%. However, owner is second after paper is textiles have number 17% but in 2011 this number decline is 11%, have same number 12% is other and food segments but in 2011 other segments lowest eight percents have number 4%. By contrast, the rated of waste disposed in food have highest number 21% in 2011.
Look at the second pie chart in 2011 with the remaining four parts. In 2005 have number lowest rated its waste disposed is 5% and 8%. But in 2011 that number increased ten times with figures of 18%, but with 5% of waste disposed in glass is stable. With metal is 8% but in 2011 this number increased 1% to 9%. Finally, green waste have number 9% and 2011 is stable. So, it can be seen that in this country have tend to disposed of waste of food and plastic than seven segments.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 126, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'figured'.
Suggestion: figured
...sed is lowest among 9 segments with has figure of 4% but this figure to 8% in 2011. Me...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 384, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'numbed', 'numbered'.
Suggestion: numbed; numbered
...1 this number decline is 11%, have same number 12% is other and food segments but in 2...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 536, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'have the highest'.
Suggestion: have the highest
...st, the rated of waste disposed in food have highest number 21% in 2011. Look at the second...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 411, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'tended'.
Suggestion: tended
...t can be seen that in this country have tend to disposed of waste of food and plasti...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, look, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1046.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 242.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.32231404959 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.06363487425 2.65546596893 78% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.417355371901 0.547539520022 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 295.2 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.8841238551 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.7142857143 112.824112599 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2857142857 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.07142857143 5.23603664747 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 1.13902439024 878% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147797154567 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0751917044224 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0499227712383 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1272886848 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0422850027725 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.6 13.2329268293 57% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 88.06 61.2550243902 144% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.2 10.3012195122 50% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 7.48 11.4140731707 66% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.31 8.06136585366 78% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 6.0 11.0658536585 54% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.