The chart below gives information about how many European citizens of various age groups frequently went to the gym from 1990 to 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph depicts information about the number of Europeans in numerous age groups who take part in gym activities on a regular basis, measured in percentages, in a period of 20 years.
Looking from an overall perspective, it is apparent that the majority went to the gym was young people aging 24 to 33 while this number of middle-aged people was the least. In addition, the rate of gym enrollment of all age groups seem to increase over the period.
At the beginning of the period, adolescents who aged 24 to 33 accounted for about 17% of gym takers while this figure of individuals who were over 44 only stood at 5%. In 1998, the figure of young people under 33 who went to the gym experienced a noticeable drop. By contrast, in the same year, the number of adults in the gym who were in 34-43 and 44-53 age group witnessed a slight increase, adding up to 6% and 8% respectively.
In 2006, the number of young people who entered the gym, aged from 18 to 23, peaked at 25%. From 2006 onwards, the Europeans citizens of all age group witnessed a gradual rise, with the exception of the number of 18-23 age group which dropped sharply to about 18%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 178, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
...all age group witnessed a gradual rise, with the exception of the number of 18-23 age group which dro...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 949.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.49763033175 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55902228303 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535545023697 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0120173793 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.625 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.375 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194097455587 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0964123486766 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0412192507822 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132969956781 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0304551911788 0.0819641961636 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.12 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.