The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The supplied bar chart describes the percentage of the Canadian population that uses a different number of social-network in the years 2014 and 2015. At first glance, we can see that the majority of Canadian use only one site. Moreover, the number of social networks taken into consideration the fewer people had a subscription.

If we consider only the 2014 year, almost a quarter of the population is not using any social site, while the highest percentage has only one subscription. Then, the rate, as a function of the number of sites, steadily decreases, passing from 27 % of people using two sites to 12% using three sites. Finally, only a tiny fraction of Canadians have chosen to frequent more than four sites.

The overall trend of the 2015 bar chart is similar to 2014. However, the number of people not interested in social networks slightly declined to 21%, while the Canadian that are subscribed to precisely one site dramatically fall of 8 percentage points. As a result, the rate of people using more than one site rose. For instance, people using subscribed to two social have a modest increase of one point percentage. On the contrary, the number of people using three, four, or five sites had a considerable uplift, since the rate of people went up respectively to 16, 8, and 4 percent.

To conclude, the overall trend did not change significantly between the two years. Nevertheless, the number of people subscribed to a few sites decreased, while a moderate increase can be seen in the case of people subscribed to a higher number of subscriptions.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 237, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of Canadian use only one site. Moreover, the number of social networks taken into...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, then, while, for instance, as a result, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1312.0 965.302439024 136% => OK
No of words: 267.0 196.424390244 136% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9138576779 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87904025678 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 106.607317073 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520599250936 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 410.4 283.868780488 145% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 7.0 1.07073170732 654% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5621698557 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.923076923 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5384615385 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.61538461538 5.23603664747 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250211555158 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102507233291 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0556411679688 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167913015548 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0603539012734 0.0819641961636 74% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.