The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph illustrated the numbers of people used social networking sites in Canada in 2014 and 2015.The bar shows the different social site at two different time period.
The Percentages of non social site users are surprising higher in both time period which is almost same (22% and 21%). Same as, the numbers of one site internet users were significantly higher in 2014(36%), it is the highest numbers of population compare among to others social media. Likewise these numbers was fall down by 8% till 2015 and remain 28%. On the other hand the numbers of two sites was almost same at 23 % and 24 % respectively in 2014 and 2015.
Meanwhile, the populations of three and four sites users are slightly lower than other users which are only 12% and 5 % in 2014. However these numbers has rose marginally till 2015. Same as the Fiver sites users are dramatically lower, where only 2 % of population has use too with this site, but this figure has slightly changed and remain 4 % in 2015.
Over all we can say that the numbers of social site user in Canada has determined by the nature of media, one and two site is most useable site over the country.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 101, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...orking sites in Canada in 2014 and 2015.The bar shows the different social site at ...
^^^
Line 1, column 163, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'period' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'periods'.
Suggestion: periods
...erent social site at two different time period. The Percentages of non social site u...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 2, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...al site at two different time period. The Percentages of non social site users ar...
^^^
Line 2, column 282, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Likewise,
...n compare among to others social media. Likewise these numbers was fall down by 8% till ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 129, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ers which are only 12% and 5 % in 2014. However these numbers has rose marginally till ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 119, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'site' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'sites'.
Suggestion: sites
...ned by the nature of media, one and two site is most useable site over the country. ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 162, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... is most useable site over the country.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, likewise, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 942.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61764705882 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39621696153 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553921568627 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 290.7 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9152584256 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.666666667 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22222222222 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233413105828 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108593636025 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0611555070132 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164771482303 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.057750915235 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.