The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The bar chart illustrates the information about the percentage of people using multiple social and networking sites in Canada in the year of 2014 and 2015.

Overall, in the bar chart witnessed show the social sites is divide in five site. However, in both year one site was so popular in Canada than among all sites. While, five sites is least used in Canada.

Firstly, 22 and 21 percent of Canadian people were no used any sites in 2014 and 2015 respectively moreover, one site was extremely famous and 36% people used this site in 2014 while, in 2015 merely 28% resident of Canada were used one site. After that the ratio of usage of social sites was declined. The 2nd sites was used 23 and 24 percent in 2014 and 2015 respectively.

Secondly, the 3rd sites social networking site was used 12% in 2014 and it was increased just 4% in 2015. However in 4th and 5th sites the people was used only 5 and 2 percent in 2014 while in 2016 it was slightly raised and the usage was reached 8 and 4% in Canada.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 77, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'site' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'sites'.
Suggestion: sites
...show the social sites is divide in five site. However, in both year one site was so ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 161, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...popular in Canada than among all sites. While, five sites is least used in Canada. ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 243, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... resident of Canada were used one site. After that the ratio of usage of social sites...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 107, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...4 and it was increased just 4% in 2015. However in 4th and 5th sites the people was use...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, moreover, second, secondly, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 827.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.42245989305 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27801210026 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.470588235294 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.9878588539 43.030603864 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.8888888889 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7777777778 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88888888889 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316958152527 0.215688989381 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.16942761155 0.103423049105 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103229238726 0.0843802449381 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2505541805 0.15604864568 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105630419925 0.0819641961636 129% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.36 11.4140731707 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.