The table below gives information about student enrolments at Manchester University in 1937 1967 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The table below gives information about student enrolments at Manchester University in 1937, 1967 and 2017.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The table despite the information about Manchester university student enrolment at three different years 1937, 1967 and 2017.

The table shows the total numbers of new students enrolled in 1937 was only 327. However this numbers was increased after 30 years where 1133 students were admitted. In 1937 the percentage of female students was 45% and 55% are male. Meanwhile, those figures were dramatically rose in 1967 where male dominate the percentages of 65%.

On the other hand, this statistic has been in increasing trend for next 30 year where 6254 students was study in 2017. This figure has been contributed by 102 countries representative as well, which is 32% as on total. This figure is significantly higher to compare with previous two academics years were 6% (from 4 nation) and 7 % (from 26 nation) overseas students only. Same as, the percentages of girls were increased to 55% and 45% are boys.

Overall, the numbers of students were increased as a time goes on and also the numbers of students who coming from the other nation to study has been in increasing trend.

Votes
Average: 7.4 (10 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 82, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...students enrolled in 1937 was only 327. However this numbers was increased after 30 yea...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 278, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'risen'.
Suggestion: risen
...nwhile, those figures were dramatically rose in 1967 where male dominate the percent...
^^^^
Line 5, column 316, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'nation' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'nations'.
Suggestion: nations
...ious two academics years were 6% from 4 nation and 7 % from 26 nation overseas student...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, well, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 902.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92896174863 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64072278443 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584699453552 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.1191531644 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.2 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19737854501 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0945824466378 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128696091799 0.0843802449381 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173511561262 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.170993761101 0.0819641961636 209% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.