The table below gives information about student enrolments at Manchester University in 1937 1967 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The enrollment statistics of students at Manchester University is illustrated in the table. The figures are given for the years 1937,1967 and 2017.

Overall, it can be seen that the University witnessed the highest enrollment in 2017.we can also see that the international reputation of the University increased during the period.

In 1937, 327 new students enrolled at the university. Among this 45% were female and 55% were male students. In these more than half of the students came from within 64 km of Manchester. Only 6% of students were international, from 4 countries. In 1967, the figures of enrollment increased to 1133. However, the proportion of female students decreased(35%), whereas the male proportion Increased(65%). The figures for international students rose to a percentage with students from 26 countries. However, Only less than a fifth of the students were from within 64 km of Manchester.

In 2017, there was a sharp increase in the student enrollment number(6254). The percentage of female students rose to 55% whereas, the ratio for men declined to 45%. The students who came from abroad increased to 32%, from over 102 countries. Finally the proportion of pupils who came from within 64 km of the city decreased to 1-2%.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 242, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...reased to 32%, from over 102 countries. Finally the proportion of pupils who came from ...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, however, if, so, whereas

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1050.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1724137931 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04387261941 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497536945813 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 22.4926829268 58% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.8972490685 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 70.0 112.824112599 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.5333333333 22.9334400587 59% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.6 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.09268292683 269% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171382071963 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0757956409273 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.066324788184 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135308195631 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0764166151726 0.0819641961636 93% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 61.2550243902 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.11 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.9970731707 65% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.