The table below shows the results of a 20 year study into why adults in the UK attend arts events Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The table illustrates the findings of a 20-year research on the question why elder people in the UK attend arts events.

Overall, it is clearly seen that the desire to see a specific performer is the main reason for this trend. In addition to this, compared to the past today fewer people visit arts events for celebrations.

To begin, 20 years ago 58% of adults in the UK went to arts events for seeing a specific performer/artist. 10 years ago there was a decline in this rate(55%), but today this figure stands at 56%. By contrast, the proportion of people going to arts events for work/business is the lowest among these. 20 years ago, only 6% of adults attented arts events because if this reason. However, today this proportion increased to 11%

Similarly, two decades ago only 9% of adults in the UK went to arts events to accompany their children, after 10 years this rose to 15% and today it stands at 24%. In the case of special occasion/celebrations, 20 years ago the figures were at 27%. This declined to 20% after 10 years and today only 9% the adults in UK visit arts events for this reason.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 56, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'art'.
Suggestion: art
...ars ago 58% of adults in the UK went to arts events for seeing a specific performer/...
^^^^
Line 5, column 242, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'art'.
Suggestion: art
...rast, the proportion of people going to arts events for work/business is the lowest ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 64, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'art'.
Suggestion: art
...ago only 9% of adults in the UK went to arts events to accompany their children, aft...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, similarly, so, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 914.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59296482412 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78504412823 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502512562814 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.9545667002 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.4 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21704054585 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114001937345 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0724386534068 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16055019768 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0638259905636 0.0819641961636 78% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.