the chart below gives information about the percentage of the adult population who were overweight in four different countries in 1980, 1990 and 2000.
A glance at the chart provided reveals the upward trends in the figures of the adult population were overweight over a 20 year period, from 1980 to 2000 in four selected countries, namely: Japan, Finland, Australia and the USA.
Overall, it is immediately apparent that all four countries witnessed similar upward trends over the given period though the USA increased at a faster pace. Another outstanding feature is that the USA had the highest percentage of overweight adults.
As regards the obese levels in the USA, it can be clearly seen that in 1980, the proportion started at 15%. The figures for Finland and Australia were lower, at about 6% and 8% respectively. Japan had the lowest figure at 1%. In 1990, the percentage of overweight adults in the USA rose to around 25% of the population, while the figures for Finland and Australia reached just under 10% and the figure for Japan remained steady.
By 2000, the proportion of weighty adolescents was highest still in the USA and lowest in Japan, at about 30% and 3% in turn. In comparison with the figure for Australia, which experienced a dramatic rise to over 20%, Finland had just over 10% of overweight adults.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 130, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: comparison,
... Japan, at about 30% and 3% in turn. In comparison with the figure for Australia, which ex...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, still, while, as regards
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 983.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86633663366 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63963534182 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549504950495 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.6313615509 43.030603864 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.222222222 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4444444444 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.11111111111 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188473505997 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0788806071859 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0631808454709 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12711306308 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0632674619231 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.