the chart below gives information about the percentage of the adult population who were overweight in four different countries in 1980, 1990 and 2000.

The bar graph represents, the proportion of the adult people who has gain more weight in various countries, namely (Japan, Finland, Australia, and USA)over a 20 year period from 1980 to 2000.

In 1980, the adult population in USA was 15% and Japan has less than five percentage.both the Finland and Australia had similar population who gain overweight that was 9%. In1990, the rate of adult people in Japan remain same as in 1980. Whereas, other countries slightly increased up to less than 13 % in Finland and Australia and 25%for USA. In 2000, the population of adult people gradually arise where USA has the highest percentage of overweight 30% and Japan has the lowest proportion less than five percentage. In comparison to Finland and Australia, Australia has overweight over 20% whereas, Finland gain 10% of weight.

Overall,USA has the higher population of overweight in adult and Japan has the lower. Australia and Finland had some minimal changes over the period.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 332, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s than 13 % in Finland and Australia and 25%for USA. In 2000, the population of a...
^^
Line 5, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , USA
... Finland gain 10% of weight. Overall,USA has the higher population of overweight...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, whereas

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 816.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75155980538 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3886853584 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.0 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.375 5.23603664747 26% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189219831369 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0953770350876 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0623713876263 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131628994187 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.034441249536 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.