The table below gives information about the problems faced by children in two primary schools in 2005 and 2015

The table compares, the difficulties faced by school students in two educational ( school A and school B) over 10 years period.

Overall, it is clear that school A children has faced more problems than school B children in all sectors.
Concentrate in lessons and following instructions had faced most difficulties in school A and reading ability and handwriting has seen least problems in schoolA in 2005.

In 2005, the highest problem faced by children in school A, followed by 40% for concentration in lessons and 42% for following instructions. It gradually declined to 18% for both concentration in lessons and following instructions in 2015.reading ability and handwriting had the least effect seen bt children in school A 22% and 28% respectively. In 2015, only one percentage was increased in reading ability but,handwriting remain same as in 2005.

In school B, handwriting and concentration in lessons remain stable in both year that was 7% and 15% according. spelling and following instructions had double the percentage of difficulties in children( 5 to 10%) and (6 to 12%). There was only minimal changes in listening skills 11% to 12% .

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 81, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed by school students in two educational school A and school B over 10 years peri...
^^
Line 3, column 34, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'A child' or simply 'children'?
Suggestion: A child; Children
...od. Overall, it is clear that school A children has faced more problems than school B c...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 131, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'seen the least'.
Suggestion: seen the least
...and reading ability and handwriting has seen least problems in schoolA in 2005. In 2005...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 321, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...east effect seen bt children in school A 22% and 28% respectively. In 2015, only ...
^^
Line 6, column 414, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , handwriting
...age was increased in reading ability but,handwriting remain same as in 2005. In school B,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 113, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Spelling
...oth year that was 7% and 15% according. spelling and following instructions had double t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 287, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...l changes in listening skills 11% to 12% .
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 967.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19892473118 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26074314852 2.65546596893 123% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510752688172 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2440921086 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.444444444 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.22222222222 5.23603664747 23% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279151317396 0.215688989381 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12659962415 0.103423049105 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0900178826556 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183202017883 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0776086471807 0.0819641961636 95% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.26 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.