The chart below gives information about the percentage of the adult population who were overweight in four different countries in 1980,190 and 2000. (Figures are given for the year, or the nearest year available.)
Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar graph illustrates the information about the terms of proportion of obese youngsters populace which was in three decades in four various regions (Japan, Finland, Australia and USA) during 1980 and 2000.
In overall, The America constituted a major for fat young ones populations since overweight adults was least in Japan. However, there were lots of transformation can be noticed in obese adult’s populace in all nations over the periods.
It can be seen from the information that USA was most popular for fat youngsters in the whole given years which accounted at a 15% of the total percentage at the beginning of the period. Similarly, it increased dramatically and reached to peak level at three in ten at the end of the period in America. In contrast, populations of overweight adults in Japan that composed of almost a little more than a 3%, remained constant during three decades.
The graph further proves that the percentage of obese young people in Finland were found one in ten, 8% and 6% respectively from 2000,1990 to 1980. Lastly , Australia accounted for over a 5% of the fat adults population in 1980 and experienced a four folds increase to a fifth in remaining years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 82, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'youngsters'' or 'youngster's'?
Suggestion: youngsters'; youngster's
... about the terms of proportion of obese youngsters populace which was in three decades in ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 155, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...pectively from 2000,1990 to 1980. Lastly , Australia accounted for over a 5% of th...
^^
Line 13, column 203, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'adults'' or 'adult's'?
Suggestion: adults'; adult's
...alia accounted for over a 5% of the fat adults population in 1980 and experienced a fo...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, lastly, similarly, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1008.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9900990099 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.869854515 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574257425743 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.9614175225 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.0 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.25 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223318200769 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.090708885469 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0446530156094 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130805216091 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0193342558925 0.0819641961636 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.