The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting by reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting by reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The bar chart illustrates how different-aged people in Britain donate their money in 1990 and in 2010.

Overall, more money is given to charity in 1990 than in 2010. Besides, looking at the chart, it is immediately obvious that people over 36 tend to contribute more.

The 18-50 age-donation in 1990 is higher than in 2010. In 1990, the least proportion was people from 18 to 25 accounting for 17 percent, and this decreased to 7 percent in 2010. During the same period, the group aged between 26 and 35 experienced a drop from 31 percent to 24 percent. The highest fraction was 36-50 age-group. This means the percentage of this group was nearly 42 in 1990 and reduced to 35 percent in 2010.

By 2010, almost 39 percent of 51-65 age-contribution is shown, which is 4 percent more than in 1990. The fingure for people over 65s was 32 percent in 1990 being lower than in 2010, at 35 percent

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, if, look

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 742.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.60869565217 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65657046094 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 190.8 283.868780488 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.86382915 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 74.2 112.824112599 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1 22.9334400587 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.2 5.23603664747 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177914631486 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0910817580034 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475539199528 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13352524492 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0313712312556 0.0819641961636 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.3 13.2329268293 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 89.08 61.2550243902 145% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.8 10.3012195122 47% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.16 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.