The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the year 1990 and 2010.
The given bar chart depicts the information about British person which gave money to donation work by different five age groups for the year 1990 and 2010. The data is caliberated in form of percentum.
As we can be seen from the graph, initially at18-25 years people less than a fifth proportion spent on charity in year 1990 and more than 5% in year 2010. However these values were increased in further age groups as well as more than 30% donate money in year 1990 by 26-35 aged inhabitant but after two decade it was decline.
Moving ahead, the data was rising sharply in 1990 through 36-50 age person it was less than one fifth while moved to next twenty years it reduced, that was 35%. As for as exactly same ratio during 51 to greater 65 age years in both years. But the 51-65 aged people were follow to peak value in year 2010 unfortunately it was less withing small proporation. Moreover at the last age group people were donate less than ten fifth in both years.
Observed that, which people lies between 30-35 years age, these were more donate on charity work as well as 18-25 age groups masses were meagre intersted in charity work.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-13 | phamngocduyen | 84 | view |
| 2019-10-08 | kulwa | 67 | view |
| 2018-12-15 | KhangEriol | 61 | view |
| 2018-10-11 | Kapil Kumar | 89 | view |
| 2018-09-10 | RaghuVJoshi | 67 | view |
- The table shows the population of three cities in 1990 the population forecast of 2000 and the actual of 2000 82
- In many countries eighteen is considered the right age to start driving a car However some people say that the legal during age should be twenty five Discuss both views and give your opinion 72
- percentags of food budget spent on resturant meals home cookingliner chart shows fast food vs sitdown resturant 61
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the year 1990 and 2010. 67
- The diagram below show how glass containers such as bottles are produced and recycled 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 156, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ear 1990 and more than 5% in year 2010. However these values were increased in further ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 304, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'decade' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'decades'.
Suggestion: decades
... by 26-35 aged inhabitant but after two decade it was decline. Moving ahead, the da...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 117, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t was less than one fifth while moved to next twenty years it reduced, that was 3...
^^
Line 5, column 359, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
... it was less withing small proporation. Moreover at the last age group people were donat...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 28, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...th years. Observed that, which people lies between 30-35 years age, these were...
^^
Line 7, column 98, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., these were more donate on charity work as well as 18-25 age groups masses were ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, well, while, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 946.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.57004830918 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.11244278631 2.65546596893 80% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579710144928 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3582497512 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.111111111 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283129074957 0.215688989381 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126565799111 0.103423049105 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0802284059578 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193228460772 0.15604864568 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0530197671357 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.22 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.