The chart illustrates the proportion of British people ranging from young age of 18 to 65 years engaging in monetary charity work. It is evident from the data that the elderly in Britain contribute significantly more money to charity than the younger population.
While the age group of 36-50 years displayed largest percentage of people donating money in 1990, the more elder population also showed better representation with almost one third of the people in the age group above 51 indulging in charity. This is in stark contrast to the younger population. The percentage of youth in Britain giving money to charity is much lower than the national average.
This trend has declined further in 2010. While the elderly population continues to account for a greater percentage in people donating money, the numbers for the younger age group of 18 years has reduced by more than a half of their percentage in 1990. Compared to both, the age group of 51-65 years has emerged as the largest contributor to charity in Britain, overtaking the age group of 36-50 years by five percent in 2010.
The conclusion that can be drawn from the data indicates that an interest towards charity is more observed in the elder population of Britain, specifically the age group of 36 years and above. However, the percentage of younger population donating money to charity is lesser and has reduced from 1990 to 2010.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 103, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'elder' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: elder
...e of people donating money in 1990, the more elder population also showed better represent...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1171.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 236.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96186440678 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65784046078 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.457627118644 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 360.9 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.6055109395 43.030603864 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.1 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.384157971689 0.215688989381 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150197118354 0.103423049105 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0864959294902 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.242401148603 0.15604864568 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0418028112065 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.