The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The given chart provides data about the percentage of people in Great Britain who donate funds to charity by dividing on several age groups over a 20-year period. Overall, differences in start and end times of such help existed.
First of all, the age group (18-25) of British individuals taking up philanthropy reduced from at least 17,5% in 1990 to almost
7,5% in 2010. Besides, there was sharply a shift in ages when people stop giving money to aid organisations. In 1990, this trend saved the growth to 50 years old totalling approximately 40% and then started to decrease to about 30% after 65. However, in 2010, the below-mentioned tendency changed the age group to 51-65 years old comprising also 40% and declining to 35% after 65.
In general, as can be seen from the chart, donating money to charity stabilised more or less starting from 26 years old to 65 years old.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 126, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed from at least 17,5% in 1990 to almost 7,5% in 2010. Besides, there was sharply...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, however, if, so, then, at least, in general, first of all, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 732.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 153.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78431372549 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51700396316 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63183713499 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.705882352941 0.547539520022 129% => OK
syllable_count: 207.0 283.868780488 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.5146334919 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.571428571 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8571428571 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.2857142857 5.23603664747 254% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208179594785 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0884846935863 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0488325474776 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110975625815 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0319418283636 0.0819641961636 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.