You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.The graph shows average annual expenditures on cell phone and residential phone services between 2001 and 2010.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons wher

Essay topics:

You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
The graph shows average annual expenditures on cell phone and residential phone services between 2001 and 2010.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.

The line diagram compares average yearly costs on mobile phone and home phone services over a 10-year period. Overall, expenses on cell phone rose dramatically, while costs on residential phone decreased considerably during the above mentioned period.

In 2001, average costs on mobile and home phone services arranged with $200 and $700 respectively. During next 5 years expenses on wireless services grew approximately in 3 times, while on home services significantly fell totaling $150. As a result, in 2006 both average costs crossed and set at least $550.

Over the following five years, expenses on mobile phone services rose to $750. This growth started at least to 4 times during that decade. As for the average costs on home services, there was a decline to $400 and, ranging from 2001 to 2010, the decrease was nearly $250. However, it is possible to make a conclusion that people stated spend more money on phone services since in 2001 total costs were $900 and in 2010 expenses rose to $1150.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 180, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... for the average costs on home services, there was a decline to 00 and, ranging f...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, while, as for, at least, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 827.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92261904762 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60705452123 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559523809524 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.7086640196 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.8888888889 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200865825677 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0926116137943 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0485441170489 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151782723531 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0306928593011 0.0819641961636 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.