the chart below show the amount of area used for growing grains between 1990 and 2010 in a state in canada.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The given bar graph illustrates the amount of land utilized to grow grains in four distinct regions in a state of canada between 1990 and 2010.
As it is presented in the graph that maximum grain was cultivated in the red field, where 60 acres of land was used in first decade, which later experienced a downfall of 4 acres in 2010. However, a completely different pattern was noticed in the case of sunny valley where almost 40 acres of land was occupied for the yield of crop in 1990. Which after witnessing a enormous gain in next period , exhibiting a massive fall and settled at 28 acres in 2010.
In terms of land in spring plains, which had a great use in 1990, experiencing a steep fall of almost 13 acres and reached at 22 acres in 2010. Whereas, land in other regions were used least to grow grains throughout the whole period, yet it also experienced a huge fall and contributed a less compared to what they were in 2010.
Overall, it is explicitly seen that land in red field utilized the most to cultivate the crops throughout the whole period. However, all the given regions experienced a substantial reduction in the yield of grains.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 366, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...of crop in 1990. Which after witnessing a enormous gain in next period , exhibiti...
^
Line 3, column 396, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...itnessing a enormous gain in next period , exhibiting a massive fall and settled a...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 950.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58937198068 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55890298125 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541062801932 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.3159304508 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.75 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.875 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159803252188 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.074394490226 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0747033034026 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113145520612 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0893857105602 0.0819641961636 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.64 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.