The chart below show degrees granted in different fields at the National University in the year 1990, 2000 and 2010.
The pie chart describes the information of degrees graduated in four different fields at the National University in 1990, 2000 and 2010. Normally, there are different fields which revealed various figures,Law the less prevalent in three years.
Firstly, in 1990, the data in figure for Computer Science and Business were highest with 30 percent for each field. Somehow, after ten years, while Computer Science shows the increase in percentage of students who granted their degrees, that of Business dropped significantly to 20 percent. Furthermore these trends remain unchanged in both fields until 2010, with 45 percent and 15 percent for Computer Science and Business respectively.
In contrast, there were fluctuations in other fields for twenty years. In one side, Medicine accounted for 25 percent of degrees and Law regarded only 10 percent for the year 1990. In the next 10 years, the percentage of degrees granted on Medicine increased up to 30 percent in 2000 and down back to the point of 1990 in 2010. However, on the other side Law decline by 5 percent in 2000 and back to same figure as it was of 1990 in 2010.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 205, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , Law
...nt fields which revealed various figures,Law the less prevalent in three years. Fir...
^^^^
Line 2, column 291, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...ss dropped significantly to 20 percent. Furthermore these trends remain unchanged in both f...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 181, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...rded only 10 percent for the year 1990. In the next 10 years, the percentage of de...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 937.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95767195767 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62994366451 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560846560847 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.6705423737 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.111111111 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11111111111 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318664304523 0.215688989381 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142435186611 0.103423049105 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.143382254791 0.0843802449381 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23839215916 0.15604864568 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.13566330464 0.0819641961636 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.