The chart below show different types of transport go to and from work in 1960, 1980, 2000.
The bar chart compares the proportions of four different means of transport which the citizens in a European city used to go to and from work in 3 years; 1960, 1980 and 2000.
It is clearly seen that people use more cars during the period shown, the opposite was true for the other three types.
In 1960, one-third of total commuters travelled to and from the workplace, made up the biggest percentage among these transports in comparison with 20% and 27% using bus and bicycle, respectively. The figure for bus significantly climbed up to about 27% after 2 decades before falling to approximately 17% in 2000. In the same year, there was a plunge in the percentage of people went on foot and by bike to 10% and 7%.
Regarding the car users, It was the least favorite transport in 1960, accounted for roughly 7%. The figure then increased sharply to nearly 40% in 2000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-11-25 | quanganh3110 | 56 | view |
- The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children’s sports between 2008 and 2014. The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same period. 89
- The charts below show reasons for travel and the main issues for the travelling public in the US in 2009. 84
- Today many children spend a lot of time playing computer games and little time on sports. Why is it? Is it a positive or negative development? 87
- Some people think that it is more effective for students to study in group while others believe that it is better for them to study on their own. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 73
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of people living alone in 5 different age groups in the US from 1850 to 2000. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, so, then, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 726.0 965.302439024 75% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68387096774 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.616811096 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.645161290323 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 208.8 283.868780488 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1181160439 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.714285714 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1428571429 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.28571428571 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252464421665 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102186344101 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.135200853421 0.0843802449381 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155617381079 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.158573107759 0.0819641961636 193% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.