The bar graph provides the information about the comparison for the two different reasons of study and the support of the employer in different age groups.
Overall it can be seen that younger students have career as the main reason of study whereas, people with over age have the interest as the main reason of study and also have the lowest employment support than younger ones.
students which have career as the reason to study have given the highest employment support. under age groups 26 have career as the reason on the top of all almost 80 percentage , which also have the highest employment support to above 60 %. As the age group increased the career reasons decreased to almost 70 % at the age of 26-29 as a result employment support also decrease to around 50%. similar features seen in age group 30- 39 and 40-49 having around 45 % career reason respectively and around 30 % employment support by both. over 40 people have the most significantly lower reason to study for the career( 20%).
Under 26 have the most lowest percentage for interest reasons whereas the age group increases the reasons to study for interest increases that is in 26- 29, there is 2% rise whereas ,in 30 - 39 the percentage rise to above 20 % followed by 40% at the age group 40 -49 and hitting the uppermost percentage to about 70% at the age of over 49.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the employer in different age groups. Overall it can be seen that younger stud...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... employment support than younger ones. students which have career as the reason...
^^^^
Line 3, column 5, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Students
...loyment support than younger ones. students which have career as the reason to stud...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 97, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Under
...e given the highest employment support. under age groups 26 have career as the reason...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 181, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...n on the top of all almost 80 percentage , which also have the highest employment ...
^^
Line 3, column 397, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Similar
...nt support also decrease to around 50%. similar features seen in age group 30- 39 and 4...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 481, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d 40-49 having around 45 % career reason respectively and around 30 % employment ...
^^
Line 3, column 540, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Over
...around 30 % employment support by both. over 40 people have the most significantly l...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er reason to study for the career 20%. Under 26 have the most lowest percentage...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 25, Rule ID: MOST_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use only 'lowest' (without 'most') when you use the superlative.
Suggestion: lowest
...he career 20%. Under 26 have the most lowest percentage for interest reasons whereas...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 25, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'most the lowest'.
Suggestion: most the lowest
...he career 20%. Under 26 have the most lowest percentage for interest reasons whereas...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 188, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...t is in 26- 29, there is 2% rise whereas ,in 30 - 39 the percentage rise to above ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, whereas, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1103.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 237.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65400843882 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45533535959 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.447257383966 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 331.2 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.6465100314 43.030603864 178% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.875 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.625 22.9334400587 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 1.69756097561 707% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269468617156 0.215688989381 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154022058916 0.103423049105 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0449451934176 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199327695449 0.15604864568 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0328340512925 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.27 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.