The supplied pie-chart delineates the differentiation in the generation of electricity from various sources in two countries and within the single year, 2009.
A glance at a graph reveals that the source of electricity was highly occupied by conventional in Germany whereas in France nuclear methods accounted for the better source of electricity.
Firstly, talking about the Germany one-fourth of the total source was coming from nuclear in contrast three-quarters of the total source was occupied by France. Moreover, There was a decrease production of electricity from renewables up to 17.4%, within this, biomass and wind are the most sources in comparison to hydroelectric and solar which account up to 17.7% and 6.1% respectively. Secondly, there was the highest percentage of a nuclear source in France and differs from conventional and renewables which are similarly made up to 10.3% and 13.7% respectively. within the renewables, hydroelectricity accounted for up to 80 % and also the highest while biomass and solar consisted for up to 8.1% and 10.5% respectively, and lastly solar act as a negligible source of electricity production which was accounted for only 0.9%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 2, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Firstly
...for the better source of electricity. firstly, talking about the Germany one-fourth o...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 72, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'come'.
Suggestion: come
...many one-fourth of the total source was came from nuclear in contrast three-quarters...
^^^^
Line 3, column 159, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Moreover
...the total source was occupied by France.Moreover, There was a decrease production of ele...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 564, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Within
...ade up to 10.3% and 13.7% respectively. within the renewables, hydroelectricity accoun...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, lastly, moreover, second, secondly, similarly, so, whereas, while, in contrast, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 994.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46153846154 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.50663874297 2.65546596893 132% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.516483516484 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 45.0 22.4926829268 200% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 160.297184941 43.030603864 373% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 248.5 112.824112599 220% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 45.5 22.9334400587 198% => OK
Discourse Markers: 29.75 5.23603664747 568% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193717910041 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13618776898 0.103423049105 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0769723180724 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162889371712 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0605064985152 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 27.0 13.2329268293 204% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 17.34 61.2550243902 28% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 15.9 6.51609756098 244% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 22.0 10.3012195122 214% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 15.28 11.4140731707 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.06136585366 121% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.5 11.4329268293 179% => OK
gunning_fog: 20.0 10.9970731707 182% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.