The graph provided the information about the fish and meat consumption per person in European country between 1979 and 2004.
There was an overall decrease trend in consumption of fish, lamb and beef over the period but Chicken consumption was the only decreased one.
In the year 1979, chicken usage was only around 140 gram per person, these figures escalate dramatically and reached closely 200 grams within 10 years. Afterwards, its consumption had marginally increased up to 230 grams at the end in between of rise and fall.
On the other hand, beef consumption plummeted from 210 grams at the start to 110 grams in the year 2004. similarly, lamb consumption also had the decrease of 100 grams over the span.
There was the lowest consumption rate for fish with only 60 grams in 1979 which slightly decrease to 40 grams and hold steadily over the end of the period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 53, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
...1979, chicken usage was only around 140 gram per person, these figures escalate dram...
^^^^
Line 4, column 105, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Similarly
...he start to 110 grams in the year 2004. similarly, lamb consumption also had the decrease...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, similarly, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 727.0 965.302439024 75% => OK
No of words: 150.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84666666667 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49963551158 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52947952486 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 200.7 283.868780488 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.2810554878 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.857142857 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4285714286 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164906713289 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0986015027272 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104937023947 0.0843802449381 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122791279446 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113750926567 0.0819641961636 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.