The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010

The supplied bar graph delineates the comparison of regular physical exercise between male and females at different age groups in Australia, in the single year 2010.
A glance at a graph reveals that proportion of females who had done regular exercise was greater in all age groups in contrast to 15 to 24 age group where males occupied higher percentage.
The similarities that can be clearly seen I the age group of 25-34 and 45-54, where males have the lowest percentage of around 40% while females had occupied the percentage of about 505. Likely, at the age group of 45-54 and 55- 64, approximately 45% of total males had done regular physical exercises whereas 53% female out of total had done physical activities and was one of the highest female activities rate.
On the other hand, the unusual features of equal physical activities between males and females were shown in the age group of 65 and over, in addition, males had highest exercise rate at the age group of 15-24.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 140, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...les at different age groups in Australia ,in the single year 2010. A glance a...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in Australia ,in the single year 2010. A glance at a graph reveals that proport...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...here males occupied higher percentage. The similarities that can be clearly see...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of the highest female activities rate. On the other hand, the unusual features ...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 155, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he age group of 65 and over in addition, males had highest exercise rate at age g...
^^
Line 4, column 163, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'had the highest'.
Suggestion: had the highest
...roup of 65 and over in addition, males had highest exercise rate at age group of 15-24.
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, whereas, while, in addition, in contrast, in contrast to, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 810.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79289940828 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51980704441 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538461538462 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 20.7210038367 43.030603864 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 162.0 112.824112599 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.8 22.9334400587 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 16.6 5.23603664747 317% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23186897686 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148140803066 0.103423049105 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0513398664555 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165884336385 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0431361525565 0.0819641961636 53% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.2329268293 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.44 61.2550243902 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.