The given column graphs compare the number of hours spent on work per week by
industrial workers in France, Denmark, Sweden and the UK in 2002. In three countries, it can
be seen that the maximum workers worked 36-40 hours, but in France the maximum
workers worked 31-35 hours per week.
Overall, France was a country where the people worked for the least hours, where as the
Swedish people spent the most time on work among the people from four different
countries.
In France, approximately half the workers worked for 31-35 hours per week. The percentage
of people who worked for 36-40 hours and 46-50 hours was 35% and 20% respectively. The
figures for the rest of the working hours accounted for around 10% workers each.
Denmark and Sweden witnessed the highest proportion of people working for 36-40 hours,
which was quite different from that of France. The second and the third place came from 31-
35 hours and 41-45 hours workers (25% and 10% in Denmark; 35% and 30% in Sweden). The
proportion of people working for the remaining hours was higher in Denmark than in
Sweden. It is interesting to note that in the UK, the percentage of people working 50+ hours was themaximum. Almost 50% worked 36-40 hours per week.
The bar charts compare the…
The bar charts compare the number of hours spent on work per week by industrial workers in France,Denmark,Sweden and the Uk in 2002.
In general,France was a country where the people worked for the least hours,where as the Swedish people spent the most time on work among the people from four different countries.
In France, approximately half the workers worked for 31-35 hours per week.The percentage of people who worked for 36-40 hours and 46-50 hours was 35% and 20% respectively. The figure for the rest of the working hours accounted for around 10% workers each.
Denmark and Sweden witnessed the highest proportion of people working for 36-40 hours,which was quite different from that of France.The second and the third place came from 31- 35 hours and 41-45 hours ( 25% and 10% in Denmark ; 35% and 30% in Sweden). The proportion of people working for the remaining hours was higher in Denmark than in Sweden.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 78, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...umber of hours spent on work per week by industrial workers in France, Denmark, S...
^^^
Line 2, column 93, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e UK in 2002. In three countries, it can be seen that the maximum workers worked ...
^^^
Line 3, column 79, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d 36-40 hours, but in France the maximum workers worked 31-35 hours per week. ...
^^^
Line 6, column 76, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
... the people worked for the least hours, where as the Swedish people spent the most tim...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 88, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...worked for the least hours, where as the Swedish people spent the most time on wo...
^^^
Line 7, column 80, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ork among the people from four different countries. In France, approximately h...
^^^
Line 10, column 90, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...for 31-35 hours per week. The percentage of people who worked for 36-40 hours and...
^^^
Line 11, column 87, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... hours was 35% and 20% respectively. The figures for the rest of the working hour...
^^^
Line 13, column 87, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rtion of people working for 36-40 hours, which was quite different from that of F...
^^^
Line 15, column 84, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...% in Denmark; 35% and 30% in Sweden. The proportion of people working for the rem...
^^^
Line 16, column 83, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ning hours was higher in Denmark than in Sweden. It is interesting to note that i...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1040.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88262910798 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28760415191 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.469483568075 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.8996064002 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.5454545455 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3636363636 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 14.0 3.83414634146 365% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 11.0 1.69756097561 648% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116400102177 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0654193127182 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0513305160926 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0587951535439 0.15604864568 38% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0450639956254 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.51 8.06136585366 81% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.