The chart below show the percentage of time working adults spent on different activities in a particular country in 1958 and 2008. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie chart give information about depicting the daily schedule of employed adults in one nation across 1958 and 2008.
Overall, people spent more time for sleeping than working in 1958 but in 2008 this number going out decreased over the years. However, we can see clear more if we look at the specific figures.
Look at the first pie chart in -958, it can be seen that, one third of the day was allocated to work (33%), with a slightly lower amount of time spent on sleeping (32%). Going out with friends and family is ranked second after sleeping in term of highest(19%). Meanwhile, social activities for working or sporting not their hobbies, and have the lowest number among six activities (2%) travel to work and (6%) sporting. Finally, relaxing at those had only (8%).
Look at the second pie chart in 2008, there was a 9% increase in work hours, and decrease 7% in sleeping hour. Travel to work and relaxing at home have the significantly increased, travel to work increased by a factor of 4, from 2% to 8%, and relaxing at home from 8% to 13%. By contrast, going out have the significantly decreased by a factor of 13, from 19% to 6%. In comparison, the portion of leisure time spent at sporting.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, look, second, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 982.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.52534562212 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47032978631 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566820276498 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.8909050487 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.2727272727 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7272727273 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.81818181818 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1707833974 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0686045301317 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0592979893819 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114466651425 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0232797323304 0.0819641961636 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.99 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.