The first graphs show the number of train passengers from 2000 to 2009; the second compares the percentage of trains running on time and target. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Two line graphs give information about people travel by trains and trains running on time and standard line, target.
Overall, it can be seen that number and percentage in 2000 is lowest but in 2009 is highest. However, we can see if we look at the specific figures.
Look at the first line graph, it can be seen that the number of train passengers in 2005 millions people but in 2003 was about 35 millions people and in 2000 have the same figure. However, from 2000 to 2002 have the significantly increased is 35 to 42 millions people. In particular, since 2005 the data have show signs of increasing year by year. In 2005, have the roses figure but in 2008 this number just has 36 and 40 millions people.
Look at the second line graph. The percentage of standard line, target was stabled from 2000 to 2009 has 95.00%. Meanwhile, percentage of trains running on time there is an unusual increase or decrease in data. In 2000 has lowest number 92.00% but in the last year 2009 is highest among ten years, has number is 97.00%. Second after 2009 in terms of high figures in 2002 and 2004 has rose figure is 95.00% and 96.00%. In 2005, was relatively stable but in 2006 and 2007 has significant reduce 92.00% and 93.00%. Finally, in 2008 has the same number with 2009 is 97.00%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 219, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'has the lowest'.
Suggestion: has the lowest
...l increase or decrease in data. In 2000 has lowest number 92.00% but in the last year 2009...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, look, second, while, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 6.8 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1048.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 233.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.49785407725 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28267280796 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.49356223176 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.9229930199 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.8571428571 112.824112599 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6428571429 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85714285714 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255107647738 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0941912335767 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0713925222876 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158711202524 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0607876307689 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.1 13.2329268293 61% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 89.08 61.2550243902 145% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.8 10.3012195122 47% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.52 11.4140731707 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.8 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.