The increasing use of computers and mobile phones has had a negative effect on young people’s reading and writing skills. Agree/Disagree?
Nowadays, in this modern life, more and more young people use computers and technology devices has had a negative effect on young people’s life reading and writing skills. This essay will examine both sides of the arguments before conclusion is drawn.
Admittedly, there are some arguments in favor of young people use computers had effects on reading and writing skills. First, by using technology devices such as mobile phones and tablets, people, especially younger are now able to keep in touch with their family members regardless geographical distance. This use computers support, presumably, tends not only to increase the overall knowledgeable about information technology rate but also to mitigate their feeling of inferiority, which eventually promotes an egalitarian society. Second, all young people use computers and technology would probably result in a greater supply of highly qualified workers, which benefits society in the long run. In fact, it is acknowledged that skilled and knowledgeable human capital is imperative to foster economic growth and technology development in any nations.
Nevertheless, the resultant problems would be far more significant than the minor benefits once young people use computers and technology for all skills. First, all young people use technology devices would likely correspond with a tremendous skills train on a country. Unable to write and read on their own and need help from computers and mobile phones, young people could become over-reliant on the Internet for reading or writing, meaning that there would be less input to develop other important areas such as healthcare system and transport infrastructure. Second, use computers fro reading and writing skills would tempt many young people including those who are not academically inclined or show no interest in education pursuits, thereby adding great burdens for university admissions and enrollment staff and potentially wasting time that these young people could have spent pursuing more hone missing skills. It, instead, would be a more skills viable option if the resources were focused on supporting less privileged yet gifted student.
In conclusion, in modern life, technology become an important part. Personally, I hold negative attitude towards increased cooperation in terms of global education matters and cultural exchange, however, we also should be alert to the potential safely of this trend.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 585, Rule ID: FOR_FRO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'for'?
Suggestion: for
...t infrastructure. Second, use computers fro reading and writing skills would tempt ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2062.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 370.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57297297297 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81372510044 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 176.041082164 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594594594595 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 643.5 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.8545869895 49.4020404114 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.285714286 106.682146367 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4285714286 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.395065906212 0.244688304435 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134358760761 0.084324248473 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120112468633 0.0667982634062 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228238680554 0.151304729494 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103954921898 0.056905535591 183% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.