The maps show the changes made to a small museum and its surroundings in 1990 and 2010.
The map show the information about how a small museum and its surrounding from 1990 to 2010. It is clear that the car park witness radical changes with the most noticeable being the coffee and garden in main entrance.
The small museum was designed in 1990 and included one restaurant, shop, car park, two garden, main road and one entrance, path. The main road directly accessible one cottage and the garden is below to the garden. Look at the map in 2010, the small museum have the garden is replaced is car park. With cottage and restaurant located convenient way for people, the restaurant next to the entrance and the cottage is behind to shop.
With the main road remain in the bottom, it becomes noticeable narrower, and go to small museum we will see shop first. Meanwhile, compared in 1990, today museum have two car park, coffee, shop, entrance and restaurant and one main road, path. Besides, exhibition room is shortened and made the road smaller. However, entrance just still here but the exhibition room of the entrance, instead of bending divided into two, was folded into one large part.
Summarize, the information by selecting and reporting the main features can be seen that, small museum have few places than in 1990
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 9, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'shows'.
Suggestion: shows
The map show the information about how a small museu...
^^^^
Line 3, column 175, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'park' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'parks'.
Suggestion: parks
...ared in 1990, today museum have two car park, coffee, shop, entrance and restaurant ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, however, look, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1027.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82159624413 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39807316835 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539906103286 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 301.5 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.7048695304 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.3636363636 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3636363636 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36363636364 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284776603171 0.215688989381 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122878041235 0.103423049105 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.159602633666 0.0843802449381 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196845050695 0.15604864568 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.127550676979 0.0819641961636 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.