The table shows the percentage of adults in urban and rural areas who took part in four free times activities in 1990 and 2010.
The table chart give information about compared the rate of adults in urban and rural areas who hold in four free times play from 1990 to 2010.
Overall, it is clear that the percentage of reading in urban area is highest among four activities. However, the different completely we can see if we look at the specific figures.
Look at the table chart in 1990. It can be seen hat adults always have reading activities in rural areas is highest is 71% but in urban area, this number is slightly is 61%. By contrast, everyone in urban areas don’t like photography activities in their free times and have only 7% but in remote areas have more than two times is 14%. However, the percentage of adults of animated play in rural areas is 18% but in city only have 10%. Finally, activities that both places are quite popular and not much different is playing, urban is 21% and countryside is 26%.
Look at the second table chart in 2010. It easy to see the difference in urban of reading activity have significantly higher is 78% and rural have same number. Second only tall reading activity is playing in urban areas have 14% and city have same number in 1990 is 26%. Meanwhile, has the lowest data among four activities is animated play and both places only have 10% and 14%. Finally, photography activity have significantly higher compared in 1990 is 17% and remote areas is 24%. So, it can be seen that, almost, everyone always like reading activity in their free time than other activities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 152, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'numbed', 'numbered'.
Suggestion: numbed; numbered
...antly higher is 78% and rural have same number. Second only tall reading activity is p...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, look, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 7.0 286% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1228.0 965.302439024 127% => OK
No of words: 265.0 196.424390244 135% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63396226415 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40515644 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.433962264151 0.547539520022 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 387.9 283.868780488 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.8674604168 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.7142857143 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9285714286 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.57142857143 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.38297253386 0.215688989381 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148328525876 0.103423049105 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.099319369488 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.280112330635 0.15604864568 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123269958043 0.0819641961636 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.67 8.06136585366 83% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.