the chart below show the proportion of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010

Essay topics:

the chart below show the proportion of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.

The given pie chart depict the ratio of British students who speak more than one language in England over two years. The data is calibrated in percentage.

The most striking feature to be observed is that Spanish was the most prevalent language after English which was used by the British students.

It can be vividly seen that in 2000, spanish led with highest 30 percent whereas French and two other language occupied second,third position with 15,10 percent respectively. There were 30 percent students who spoke no other language.

Turning to rest of description in 2010, Spanish had largest 35 percent followed by two other language with 20 percent. The students who did not used no other language and those who spoke French with English were equally reported. As far as comparison is concerned, the trend of speaking French was decreased in 2010 compare to 2000.further, the ratio who used two other languages were more in 2010.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (2 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...e data is calibrated in percentage. The most striking feature to be observed is...
^^^
Line 5, column 127, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , third
...h and two other language occupied second,third position with 15,10 percent respectivel...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
second, so, third, whereas

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 788.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 156.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05128205128 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53411884305 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57937757834 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 225.9 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.0998891351 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321351774508 0.215688989381 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145155901611 0.103423049105 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0934344482635 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186768755483 0.15604864568 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0830712924691 0.0819641961636 101% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.