The chart below show the total number of telephone calls in minutes( in billions) in the UK and it is categories into three .
Summarise the information below by making comparison where necessary
The bar chat depicts the total number of minutes of cell phone calls in the Britain, divided into three different groups, between 1995 and 2002. Unit measured in billions.
Overall, local fixed line calls remained popular across the period in review. Whereas, mobile calls was least popular within the same time bracket.
In 1995, the total number of minutes spent on local-fixed line calls was a slightly above 70 billion in the united Kingdom. However, fixed line call rates was just about half of this figure in the same year. Subsequently, local fixed line call rate continue to rise steadily over the years, and peaked at approximately 90 billion in 1998 and 1999, which was the highest within the stated time frame. Afterwards, it then decreased gradually to around 71 billion 2002. In contrasts, national and international fixed-line witnessed a steady increase over 6 years period, and reached approximately 60 billion minutes in 2002.
Furthermore, in 1995, local call minutes stood at about 1 billion. It then rose significantly over the years, and reached a peak of about 45 billion at the end of the period in review.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 79, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ed popular across the period in review. Whereas, mobile calls was least popular within ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 519, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s, national and international fixed-line witnessed a steady increase over 6 years...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, then, whereas, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 951.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0585106383 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61032593633 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574468085106 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.31976534 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.4545454545 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0909090909 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.72727272727 5.23603664747 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155541811908 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0662726942641 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0556925691285 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102608847244 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0424999804285 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.