The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast foods in Britain. The graph shows the trends in consumption of fast foods.
The bar graph illustrates the expenditure on fast foods by income groups in Britain in 1990 and the line graph describes the different in the utilization of those foodstuffs during the period of 20 years. Overall, people spent most of money on hamburger while fish and chips were eaten the most from 1970 to 1990.
Hamburgers came top with 42% and 32% in high and average income groups respectively while the figure took a second place in low group. Pizza took the similar pattern with the former with 18% of money spent by high income and 12% by average while just 7% paid by the low one. Fish and chips came not far behind with 16% amount of money spent by high income, which was at the same level as low group, compared to 25% by the average.
In 1970, pizza was consumed the most with just 300 whereas hamburgers, fish and chips stood at under 100. The consumption of pizza experienced a gradual decrease to 200 by 1990. Before shooting up dramatically to exactly 500, hamburger consumption increased slightly to 150 in 1980 while fish and chips went up by varying degree to 290 in 1990.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 90, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...average income groups respectively while the figure took a second place in low gr...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 899.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.56345177665 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38973644342 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558375634518 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5062900706 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.375 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.625 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116651742646 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0518092380159 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0492813837701 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0835155911877 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0568927043639 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.