The chart below shows the amount spent on six consumer goods in four European countries.
The deep analysis of the provided chart reveals information about that the how much money provided on the six products which are purchased by four European nations.
Overall, what stands out from the chart is that the Britain people spent the most money on every product while, Germany citizen was not interested in expense their salaries on these items.
Looking at the chart in more detail, Germany and Italy spent equal amounts of money on personal stereos, tennis racquets and perfumes with prior was 145 thousand pounds, the latter was 150 thousand pounds. Although, France and Britain were the same in providing money on personal stereos and tennis racquets. While, France was negligible higher in spending money on perfume with 160 thousand pounds.
Analyzing further, in Germany and Italy, a bit increased in spend money on toys at 150 and 157 thousand pounds respectively. Franch had similar expenses on CDs and toys with 158 thousand pounds. In contrast, Britain had ascending order into spending money such as CDs, toys and photographic films with 163, 168 and 170 thousand pounds.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 72, Rule ID: THE_HOW[1]
Message: Did you mean 'how'?
Suggestion: how
...ed chart reveals information about that the how much money provided on the six products...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 310, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...n personal stereos and tennis racquets. While, France was negligible higher in spendi...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 95, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed in spend money on toys at 150 and 157 thousand pounds respectively. Franch had...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, so, while, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 923.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15642458101 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39479163951 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608938547486 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9219809781 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.375 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.375 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0923855362449 0.215688989381 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0393310069484 0.103423049105 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0560922278601 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0702890574883 0.15604864568 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0570797871851 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.