The chart below shows the amount of time that 10 to 15-year-olds spend chatting on the Internet and playing on games consoles on an average school day in the UK.
The chart illustrates, the number of hours spend on the internet by percentage of adolescent children residing in the UK playing games and chatting during a school day.
Overall, it is clear from the graph that, a considerably large % of boys spend their time playing video games, whereas girls were involved in doing internet chatting on per day basis. Additionally, more than 4 hours per day is utilized by both sexes using internet for above-mentioned purposes. After that, 1 to 3 hours per day was maximum utilized time by youngsters in doing both gaming and chatting. When we observe the total almost equal hours are spent by both sexes on each activity.
On the one hand, less than 1 hour per day is spent on chatting by around 25% of boys and girls. 60% of girls and 50% of boys spend 1 to 3 hours per day talking through web space. Furthermore, about 69% of females and around 55% of males spend more than 4 hours chatting with friends and family. When we look at the total column, approximately 61% children used the internet for conversing for more than 4 hours daily. About 57% of children were seen using it for 1 to 3 hours and 25% used it for less than 1hour per day in relation to internet chatting.
On the other hand, about 82% of boys played games on the internet for more than 4 hours daily, whereas 51% of girls enjoyed games for same period. When we see 1 to 3 hours per day slot around 73% of males and 50% girls were noted playing consoles. The percentage that played for less than an hour was 30% boys and 37% girls. It is evident that boys played internet- based video games more than girls who spend their time on chat. The total also showed 32% and 62 % of children (both boys and girls combined) playing for less than 1 hour and 1 to 3 hour respectively. 69% spend more than 4 hours per day in doing these fun activities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 546, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'hour' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'hours'.
Suggestion: hours
...playing for less than 1 hour and 1 to 3 hour respectively. 69% spend more than 4 hou...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, look, so, whereas, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1509.0 965.302439024 156% => OK
No of words: 342.0 196.424390244 174% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.41228070175 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 3.73543355544 115% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40492378183 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 106.607317073 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.415204678363 0.547539520022 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 423.0 283.868780488 149% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 8.94146341463 179% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.5073776083 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.3125 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.375 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4375 5.23603664747 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70975609756 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200631574399 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0933126849865 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0769562181898 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180789511575 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0884572803684 0.0819641961636 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 84.0 61.2550243902 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.3 11.4140731707 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.03 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.