The chart below shows the annual number of rental and sales in various formats of films from a particular store between 2002 and 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Given is the bar chart delineating the figure of films’ products in distinct forms sold and rented yearly/which was rented and sold yearly over a 9-year period, initiating from 2002.

It is perceptible that the popularity of VHS crashed down and totally disappeared in 2006, meanwhile, the reverse was true with blu-ray sales with the appearance in 2007. Besides, the sales of rental was on a plummeting trend; on the other hand, that of DVD soared in the half-first phase before moderately diminishing.

Starting with 175.000 products, the rental stayed in the highest ranked position in 2002; however, after 9 years, it declined to 58.000 in 2011. Meanwhile, the DVD sales was the minority with 48.000 in the first year and became by far the most dominant category from 2004 and peaked its zenith in 2007 of 215.000 before ending up with 180.000 outputs in 2011.

Furthermore, the VHS and blu-ray sales were in the opposite trend. 85.000 VHS was recorded in the 2002s before slumping to 10.000 2 years later; by contrast, it absolutely vanished from the market from 2006. Moreover, the blu-rays’ commenced for the first time in 2007 with nearly 1.000 and accreted to 15.000 in the last year.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 129, Rule ID: BLU_RAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Blu-ray'?
Suggestion: Blu-ray
...6, meanwhile, the reverse was true with blu-ray sales with the appearance in 2007. Besi...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 26, Rule ID: BLU_RAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Blu-ray'?
Suggestion: Blu-ray
...s in 2011. Furthermore, the VHS and blu-ray sales were in the opposite trend. 85.00...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, furthermore, however, moreover, so, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1005.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97524752475 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57517595951 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60396039604 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3338163614 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.625 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.25 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 5.23603664747 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0902523315487 0.215688989381 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0437764771228 0.103423049105 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0229883943091 0.0843802449381 27% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0586889787041 0.15604864568 38% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0154841069239 0.0819641961636 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.