The chart below shows the annual number of rentals and sales (in various formats) of films from a particular store between 2002 and 2011.

The give bar chart well displays how annual sales and rentals in various range of films were distributed from a particular store, within nearly a decade, from 2002 to 2011. It can be clearly seen from the graph that there are three main significant trends: upwards, downwards and unstable.
In details, the amount of film rentals had a good starting point, with approximately 185000 in 2002, before falling off gradually to under 60000 in the end of the period. The same scenario occurred with the annual number in sales of VHS, which began with over 70000 in 2002. It then went down constantly to 10000 in the year of 2005, before getting faded until 2011. On the other hand, Blue-ray sales had no signal of emerge during the first half of the assessed decade. It then started to rise with a very small amount of sales in 2007, which was around 1000 respectively, and grew up slowly afterwards. Last but not least, the annual number of selling DVD reached a peek at over 210000 in the year of 2007, from a poor starting point (45000 in 2002). It then had a slight decrease until the end of the period.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 387, Rule ID: BLU_RAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Blu-ray'?
Suggestion: Blu-ray
...ng faded until 2011. On the other hand, Blue-ray sales had no signal of emerge during th...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, then, well, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 903.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.53768844221 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28563131372 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618090452261 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.3766331473 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.333333333 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1111111111 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301514379937 0.215688989381 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105266081282 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126864951486 0.0843802449381 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.259174764731 0.15604864568 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.095279226993 0.0819641961636 116% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.05 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.