The chart below shows the annual pay ( thousand of dollars ) for doctors and the other workers in 7 countries in 2004

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the annual pay ( thousand of dollars ) for doctors and the other workers in 7 countries in 2004

The line graph compares the money was paid every year for doctors and the other workers in seven countries in 2004.
Overall, it is clear that all the countries had the money paid for doctors totally much higher than for the other workers. The annual pay in the US was the most highest , compared with that of the other workers during the period shown.
Italy, Czech Republic and Germany are 3 countries that had the lowest money pay for other workers with just under $20.000. Also, the money pay for doctor in those countries was similarly at 60.000 dollars. Finland had the lowest money was paid for doctors with approximately $50.000. Besides, the money paid for the others workers in that country was higher than $20.000.
The highest money was paid for doctors and the other workers was in the US with respectively 120 and 40 thousand dollars. The annual pay in Switzerland and France was close to $70.000 each one for doctors and that of other workers was approximately $40.000

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 156, Rule ID: MOST_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use only 'highest' (without 'most') when you use the superlative.
Suggestion: highest
...rkers. The annual pay in the US was the most highest , compared with that of the other worke...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 168, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...nnual pay in the US was the most highest , compared with that of the other workers...
^^
Line 3, column 342, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d for the others workers in that country was higher than 0.000. The highest mone...
^^
Line 4, column 252, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of other workers was approximately 0.000
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, similarly, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 17.0 33.7804878049 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 805.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70760233918 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.2300358208 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 75.0 106.607317073 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.438596491228 0.547539520022 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 227.7 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 19.1427386871 43.030603864 44% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.4444444444 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.11111111111 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.350414801004 0.215688989381 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.197903492124 0.103423049105 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0460854624768 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.269619352476 0.15604864568 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.014685084781 0.0819641961636 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.89 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.