The chart below shows the average cost of monthly contract for four different mobile (cell) phones in a European country from January to September 2002, measured in euro.
The graph demonstrates how much residents in a European nation defray contract per month of four distinct mobile phones between January and September in 2002. Generally, overall trend was upward, except for the falling pattern in Sim TX.
In January, Domo ranked first in the graph and Alpha was paid the least, while Lex and Sim TX was at the second and the third, respectively. In the 5 ensuing months, Sim TX witnessed a steadily increase, albeit irregularly, then converged with Lex, which rose moderately from nearly 13 euros, at roughly 14 euros. Conversely, cost of Alpha grew slightly to 7 euros prior coming back to the January’s expenditure at 5 euros.
Regard the period of June – September, the consumption of Alpha went through a particular growth and surpassed the remains to peak at 25 euros. On the other hand, the cost of Sim TX and Domo went through its respective peak of 25 euros and 13 euros before went down slowly. It is noticeable the remain also enjoyed a gradual rise to nearly 18 euros in September.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 28, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
The graph demonstrates how much residents in a European nation defray c...
^^^^
Line 2, column 184, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('steadily') instead an adjective, or a noun ('increase') instead of another adjective.
... the 5 ensuing months, Sim TX witnessed a steadily increase, albeit irregularly, then converged wit...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 292, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...fore went down slowly. It is noticeable the remain also enjoyed a gradual rise to nearly 1...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, first, second, so, then, third, while, except for, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 859.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79888268156 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7157159528 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642458100559 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.7530486294 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.375 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.375 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.75 5.23603664747 205% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162291571055 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0698074136585 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0902781378554 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12100610413 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0928650826982 0.0819641961636 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.