The chart below shows the changes in car ownership in Great Britain between 1961 and 2001
The line graph, representing data in percentage terms, depicts the changing trends in the proportion of people living in Great Britain with one car, of residents owing two or more personal automobiles as well as those who were of permanent public transport use throughout the period from 1961 to 2001.
As can be seen from the chart, the overall pattern is dynamical elimination of the gap between the ratio of people without any personal vehicles and those who had one and more cars starting from 1961. Moreover, a similar pattern of dynamic rise in one car ownership and two-car possession could be distinguished, while the line representing the group of people with no car followed the graduate downward trend over the span of the period.
As getting into details, one can conclude that the trend of the one car ownership was noticeably growing from approximately 35% early on and reached its all-time highs in 1981 (50%) with further marginal fall to above 40% in the period end. At the same time, the percentage of people with 2 or more automobiles increased by 15% in 1981 and continued to grow further to almost 30% at the end of the observed period.
By contrast, the trend of people with no car was reversed and undergone a rapid fall to below 35% in 1981 from 65% in the beginning with an even greater decline to 40 year-lows of 28% in 2001.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 194, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...decline to 40 year-lows of 28% in 2001.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
moreover, so, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1117.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 238.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69327731092 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62296962142 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 106.607317073 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563025210084 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 335.7 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 39.0 22.4926829268 173% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.8200510122 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 186.166666667 112.824112599 165% => OK
Words per sentence: 39.6666666667 22.9334400587 173% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 5.23603664747 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207360257653 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0974628003336 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.058792932893 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121382362729 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0589769442116 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.5 13.2329268293 155% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.1 10.3012195122 156% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.6 10.9970731707 160% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.