The charts below show the proportions of the world's oil resources held in different areas, together with the proportions consumed annually in the same areas.
The compound graph, representing data in the in percentage terms, depicts the patterns of world oil reserves as well as the consumption level per annum attributed to the various countries.
Looking from an overall perspective, the oil resources are distributed and consumed miscellaneously, with some parts of the world having an enormous volume of oil preserved in comparison to the level of consuming capacity whole others experiencing a shortage of oil resources. It is also apparent that all countries are lagging far behind the Middle East volume of the World’s oil reserves. Furthermore, Asia, the US, and Western Europe are the leading consumers whereas all the rest of the World are in the back row with a huge gap in consumption volumes.
As getting into details, the Middle East being second to none possess approximately 60% of the world oil resources, nevertheless it consumes only 6.15% of oil. The second place is taken by Canada having almost 15% of oil world resources with the consumption even smaller than that of the leader. A whole lot of other countries can be grouped since they own less than 10% of total oil reserves each with Australia and New Zealand closing the list.
As for the consumption level, the top-3 countries are Asia with a rate of under 30%, the US having 25.48%, and Western Europe (19.24%). Central Asia and South America, with the consumption volume equating to almost 8%, lead the rest of the countries the oil appetite of the last-named quite unevenly apportioned in the range between 6.56% and 1.3%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 298, Rule ID: WHOLE_LOT[1]
Message: Use simply 'lot'.
Suggestion: lot
...even smaller than that of the leader. A whole lot of other countries can be grouped since...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, look, nevertheless, second, so, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1289.0 965.302439024 134% => OK
No of words: 259.0 196.424390244 132% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97683397683 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78262952738 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 106.607317073 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563706563707 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 386.1 283.868780488 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.533142311 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.222222222 112.824112599 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.7777777778 22.9334400587 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.88888888889 5.23603664747 189% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178788141451 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0806092150021 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.041963453019 0.0843802449381 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105769060782 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0554911139523 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.2 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 40.7170731707 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.