The chart below shows the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisions where relevant.
The line charts illustrates the proportion of households owning three distinct electrical appliances (Washing Machines, Refrigerator and Vacuum Cleaner) and the time consumed (week per hours) doing the housework in a country over a period of almost 100 years.
Overall, while the number of houseworking hours decreased significantly, reducing about 40 hours per week over the period of 10 decades, the proportion of households possessing the electrical appliances increased at a considerable amount in each category of appliances.
Specifically, the percentage of households owning a refrigerator observed a massive rise of about 100% from being close to zero in 1920 to being ubiquitous in 2019. On the other hand, proportion of households possessing washing machine vacillated between the period going from 60% to around 50% and then increased to a former percent in order to further gain an increasing momentum. The adoption of vacuum cleaners increased steadily starting at 30% in the beginning and ending up to 100% possession in the households till 2019.
With the increase in the owners of electrical appliances in households, the amount of house work per week decreased gradually reducing it to 10 hours per week. Interestingly, at the end of the time span, most of the households owned electrical appliances contrasting to very few owners in the start (almost between zero to forty percent). In 1940, all the appliances compared in the chart observed an equal proportion of around 50% while in 1960, refrigerator overtook the ratio by 20% and rose to 90% compared to the remaining appliances which remained at 70%
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 151, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...achines, Refrigerator and Vacuum Cleaner and the time consumed week per hours doi...
^^
Line 3, column 271, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... amount in each category of appliances. Specifically, the percentage of househol...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 530, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...possession in the households till 2019. With the increase in the owners of elect...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 33.7804878049 172% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1368.0 965.302439024 142% => OK
No of words: 258.0 196.424390244 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3023255814 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08102235566 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507751937984 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 405.0 283.868780488 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.5873763262 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 171.0 112.824112599 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.25 22.9334400587 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183785332225 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0856237831786 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0424935819669 0.0843802449381 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122731687029 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0354852652499 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.7 13.2329268293 149% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.0 61.2550243902 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.3012195122 153% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 11.4329268293 175% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 11.0658536585 181% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.