You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The table below gives information about rail transport in four countries in 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 w

Essay topics:

You should spend about 20 minutes on this task. The table below gives information about rail transport in four countries in 2007. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words

The data compares the transportation through railway in four countries (Canada, Malaysia, China and UAE) which is classified into three criteria for the year 2007.
At a glance, China topped the figures in the amount of people using railway and also had the highest number of kilometer traveled by a passenger. However, the cargo carried by the Canadians was the most.
The Chinese outnumbered the figure of people using rail transportation contrasting to the Canadians which was mere 10% of the Chinese population. Furthermore, Malaysia and UAE had an almost similar number of people using railways.
In terms of the number of kilometers traveled by a passenger, China was significantly far ahead with the highest number of kilometer. Malaysia and UAE, again remained comparatively equal in this criteria too, around 780 and 750, whereas Canada, due to its less popularity in railways had the least number of kilometer count per head.
Interestingly, despite of the usage of rail transport in Canada being less, Canadians carried the most luggage which was around 30 billion followed by the Chinese (around 23 billion) and again the people of Malaysia and UAE carried a commensurate amount of cargo.

Votes
Average: 1.1 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 190, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
..., again remained comparatively equal in this criteria too, around 780 and 750, where...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, so, whereas

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1011.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21134020619 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87422329128 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536082474227 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 310.5 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.328402768 43.030603864 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.375 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0574046469636 0.215688989381 27% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0264503836664 0.103423049105 26% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0268853366104 0.0843802449381 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0374110381666 0.15604864568 24% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0237468584185 0.0819641961636 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.