You should spend about 20 minutes on this task. The table below gives information about rail transport in four countries in 2007. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words
The table helps compare the data of railway networks in four varying nations: Malaysia, Canada, China, and the UAE in 2007. At a glance, it is evident that the railway was prevalently used by the Chinese passengers, while in Canada, it was used widely for freighting goods.
Talking about the details, a significant number of people in China travelled by train, accounting for 27 million in 2007, dominating the other nations. Out of four, the highest average travelling distance of Chinese seemed approximately three times more than the conforming number of Malaysians, which is 770 kilometres. In contrast, the rail in Canada carried huge amounts of loads, almost 28.20 tonnes, but a few numbers of travellers, nearly 0.3 million.
It is also worth noting that Malaysian and the UAE’s railways shared almost a similar pattern in all of the three categories. While the former catered to 5.9 million travellers in 2007, the latter did a slightly lower, 5.5 million. Similarly, there is hardly any difference seen between the amount of freight carried by train in both of these nations, which accounts for 22.2 tonnes and 21.9 tonnes respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 98, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ways shared almost a similar pattern in all of the three categories. While the former cate...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, similarly, so, while, in contrast, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 967.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14361702128 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72408464739 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664893617021 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.0213895106 43.030603864 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 120.875 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.875 5.23603664747 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0697651958687 0.215688989381 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0306623568184 0.103423049105 30% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0259363393429 0.0843802449381 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0462631229336 0.15604864568 30% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0246207415663 0.0819641961636 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.