The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries.
The line chart illustrates the global water usage, bifurcated into three sectors (Agriculture, Industrial and Domestic) whereas the table represents the water consumption of Brazil and Congo in the year 2000, based on three distinct criteria. Unit of measurement was kilometer cube.
Overall, the water usage increased gradually in all the three domains but there was a steep rise in the agricultural use over the period of 100 years. Furthermore, Brazil lead the chart as compared to Congo’s negligible population, associated land available for irrigation and water consumption of an individual.
Specifically, in 1900, agriculture sector had already consumed a significant amount of water with respect to industrial and domestic sectors, which consumed a quintessential amount of water at that time. Moreover, both the counterparts observed a steady increase in water usage from 1930 onwards till 2000 wherein the industrial consumption of water rose 1000 times and the domestic consumption increased to 250 times. Agricultural consumption maintained its position at the top and increased more than 2500 times from the beginning.
In terms of water consumption in Brazil and Congo, it is evident that Brazil had outnumbered Congo in population and hence its irrigated land and water consumption per person was grossly large than Congo.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 172, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Brazil) must be used with a third-person verb: 'leads'.
Suggestion: leads
...eriod of 100 years. Furthermore, Brazil lead the chart as compared to Congo’s neglig...
^^^^
Line 3, column 213, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... amount of water at that time. Moreover, both the counterparts observed a steady ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, so, whereas, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1138.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5512195122 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05495959192 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59512195122 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 349.2 283.868780488 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.0204883625 43.030603864 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.25 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.625 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.375 5.23603664747 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234134666211 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101716828152 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054352355967 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149526758439 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00459066423262 0.0819641961636 6% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.2329268293 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 61.2550243902 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.21 11.4140731707 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.06136585366 123% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 40.7170731707 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.