The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in Newport city centre from 2003 - 2012 .
This graph illustrates how crime rates altered in Newport inner city during the period 2003 - 2012 . We can see immediately that the greatest change occurred in the number of burglaries, while incidents of remained low but steady.
In 2003 , we can see that burglary was the most common crime, with approximately 3,400 reported cases.the figure rose to around 3,700 in 2004 , but then there was a downward trend until 2008 . At this point the figure stood at just over 1,000 incidents. This rose slightly in 2009, then continued to fluctuate for the remaining period .
In 2003 , the number of cars being stolen stood at around 2,800 and followed a similar trend to burglary until 2006 . At this point the number rose, standing at around 2,200 in 2007 . There was a marginal decrease in the following year, but from then on, the trend was generally upwards.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 99, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...inner city during the period 2003 - 2012 . We can see immediately that the greates...
^^
Line 1, column 158, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...iately that the greatest change occurred in the number of burglaries, while inci...
^^
Line 1, column 188, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e occurred in the number of burglaries, while incidents of remained low but stea...
^^
Line 2, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...nts of remained low but steady. In 2003 , we can see that burglary was the most c...
^^
Line 2, column 62, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...that burglary was the most common crime, with approximately 3,400 reported cases....
^^
Line 2, column 143, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
....the figure rose to around 3,700 in 2004 , but then there was a downward trend unt...
^^
Line 2, column 192, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...en there was a downward trend until 2008 . At this point the figure stood at just ...
^^
Line 2, column 336, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ed to fluctuate for the remaining period . In 2003 , the number of cars being sto...
^^
Line 3, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...uate for the remaining period . In 2003 , the number of cars being stolen stood a...
^^
Line 3, column 116, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...d a similar trend to burglary until 2006 . At this point the number rose, standin...
^^
Line 3, column 148, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...il 2006 . At this point the number rose, standing at around 2,200 in 2007 . There...
^^
Line 3, column 182, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... rose, standing at around 2,200 in 2007 . There was a marginal decrease in the fo...
^^
Line 3, column 237, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...marginal decrease in the following year, but from then on, the trend was general...
^^
Line 3, column 256, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n the following year, but from then on, the trend was generally upwards.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 706.0 965.302439024 73% => OK
No of words: 145.0 196.424390244 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86896551724 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.47010008196 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46794254966 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.634482758621 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 197.1 283.868780488 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.7484276419 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.25 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.125 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 14.0 1.69756097561 825% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0995622833122 0.215688989381 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0445793934966 0.103423049105 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0625288052592 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0796538719244 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0625585198465 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.67 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.