The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in Newport city centre from 2003-2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in Newport city centre from 2003-2012
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The chart gives information about how rates of crime changing in the inner city between 2003 to 2012.
The decrease of the burglary which as a tape of crime received the highest occur (bout 3800 of incidents) in 2004, compared with 1400 incidents in six years. There was a significantly drop Fromm 2004 to 2008, with decline from 3800 to 1200 matters of offenses. Likewise, a stable trend can be seen between 2009 to 2012.
In contrast, the incidents of car ranging from 2000 to 2900, with it was excess of the burglary affairs between 2006 and 2007. The interesting is that, we can also see a stable wave in the robbery(theft Fromm the person)similarly, fluctuating between 500 and 800 incidents.
Overall, the rate of car theft and robbery are more stable, with the car theft has a slightly increase after 2008. But the burglary saw a dramatically decease from 2004 to 2008, by which car theft had become the main criminal comfort.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 69, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...about how rates of crime changing in the inner city between 2003 to 2012. The de...
^^
Line 2, column 166, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('significantly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('drop') instead of another adjective.
... 1400 incidents in six years. There was a significantly drop Fromm 2004 to 2008, with decline from 3...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 83, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...from 2000 to 2900, with it was excess of the burglary affairs between 2006 and 20...
^^
Line 4, column 84, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('slightly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('increase') instead of another adjective.
...are more stable, with the car theft has a slightly increase after 2008. But the burglary saw a dram...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 85, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re more stable, with the car theft has a slightly increase after 2008. But the bu...
^^^^
Line 4, column 139, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('dramatically') instead an adjective, or a noun ('decease') instead of another adjective.
...crease after 2008. But the burglary saw a dramatically decease from 2004 to 2008, by which car theft h...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, likewise, similarly, so, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 770.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72392638037 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65043455725 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.613496932515 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 214.2 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.8163620914 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.25 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.375 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102392933018 0.215688989381 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.050925583508 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0739406708696 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0838447009318 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0915900727435 0.0819641961636 112% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

In Panama, the head of the government is Juan Carlos Varela. The government system of Panama is a Unitary presidential constitutional republic. In Panama, the legislative power is vested in a National Assembly; this is a Unicameral legislative body, and therefore a Unicameral National Assembly. According to the World Bank Group, the government effectiveness index of Panama is 0.27. http://www.confiduss.com/en/jurisdictions/panama/politics/