The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The charts give information about electricity producing by five various energy sources in two different nations between 1980 to 2000.
The units of electricity by coal placed the largest proportion in the Australia, more than doubled to 130 in 2000, but this source in less important in France, producing 25 units of electricity in both years. Nuclear Power was seen the main energy to produce electricity in France which the figure rising by 126 in 2000, but the Australia did not use this source.
The amount of the electricity created by Hydro Power which occupied a quarter of all sources in Australia while it was less means in France to use it, with felling from 5 to 2. We can saw a similar trend in both countries, using Natural Gas 2 units in 2000, with a significantly dropped from 1980. The proportion of electricity created by oil also saw a different trend in these two nations, increasing slightly to 26 units in France but falling dramatically to 2 units in Australia.
Overall, Australia and France relied on different fuel sources. While coal and Hydro Power were vital for Australia, nuclear power dominated France’s source sector.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 120, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun means is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...f all sources in Australia while it was less means in France to use it, with felling...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 963.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93846153846 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78672536578 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553846153846 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 290.7 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2605919527 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.375 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.375 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27609390711 0.215688989381 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128593168275 0.103423049105 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0356796404021 0.0843802449381 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173054200283 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0244393673229 0.0819641961636 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.