The chart below shows the global sales of different kinds of digital games from 2000 to 2006.
The depicted bar graph enumerates the comparative data about the international sales of distinct sorts of digital games for over six years.
Overall, it is clear that the majority of handheld games had gradually inclined throughout the years. Whereas, console games experienced steadily slumped.
To initiate, the most marked change had seen in handheld games, rising from nearly 12 billion dollars in 2000 to approximately 15 billion dollars in 2004, which later peaked exactly 18 billion dollars in 2006. Moreover, there seems to have substantially risen in terms of online games as well as mobile phone games inclining from a tiny proportion of billion dollars in 2001 to nearly 10 billion dollars in 2006 and climbing from 2 billion dollars in 2002 to about 7 billion dollars at the end of the given period, respectively.
Furthermore, in terms of console games, the sales ratio had moderately fallen from nearly 6 billion dollars in 2000 to around 5 billion dollars in 2004, which had definitely diminished at 3 billion dollars in 2000.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 103, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...radually inclined throughout the years. Whereas, console games experienced steadily slu...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, moreover, so, well, whereas, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 886.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18128654971 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76148499747 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578947368421 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 86.5821703483 43.030603864 201% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 147.666666667 112.824112599 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 5.23603664747 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15196789162 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0844249048871 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0241186571106 0.0843802449381 29% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0992686262977 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0159274753071 0.0819641961636 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.2329268293 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.